Archive for January, 2010
Why Health Care Costs Are Out of Control-Ask the Drug Companies
US judge rules nine pharmaceutical companies overcharged for drugs
by Mark Todoruk
A federal judge ruled that nine companies, including Pfizer, Merck & Co., Novartis, Teva and Mylan, illegally sought to increase market share by selling drugs to physicians at discounts to average wholesale prices, Bloomberg reported on Thursday. US District Judge Patti Saris said the drugmakers “attempted to obtain payment from public funds on behalf of [healthcare] providers by means of a materially false statement or representation” about the prices of nine drugs.
Commenting on the case, which was filed by New York City and 42 counties in the state, Saris said “there is simply no evidence that defendants believed that the prices they reported were even true list prices.” Experts testifying for the plaintiffs indicated that records show that wholesale acquisition costs reported by the drugmakers were consistently more than 50 percent above actual acquisition costs, and sometimes more than 1000 percent above.
Spokesmen for Pfizer and Merck indicated the companies are considering appealing the ruling, which is Saris’ latest decision in the nine-year litigation over average wholesale prices. Ron Rogers of Merck said the drugmaker “and other defendants in no way benefited from these rates as they do not receive reimbursement from Medicaid.”
Pfizer’s Chris Loder said the company “disputes that any pricing information provided by its Wyeth subsidiary regarding its prescription drugs caused [the plaintiffs] to overpay.” He added that “no one was misled,” as the decisions at issue in the judge’s ruling were informed choices made by the federal government with awareness of prices being paid in the market
9.5 Million Dollar Verdict in Take Home Mesothelioma Case
Posted by Chris in Mesothelioma on January 27th, 2010
Today a Baltimore jury returned a verdict of $9,985,000 against ATTRANSCO on behalf of LeRoy J. Conway, Jr. and his wife, Yolanda. Leroy’s father worked for ATTRANSCO beginning in the early 1960s through the 1970s as a merchant mariner in the engine rooms of ships with steam equipment and exposed his son to asbestos when he came home from work. Leroy’s claim was for his exposure in the 1970’s. Leory was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma when he was 44 years-old and underwent the removal of his lung shortly thereafter. Congratulations to my friends and co counsel Scott Frost, Demetrios Zacharapoulos, and George Tankard of Waters & Kraus on their well deserved victory.
For more information on recent mesothelioma verdicts see http://www.mesotheliomalegalblog.com/mesothelioma-litigation/verdictsandsettlements.html
Mesothelioma Plaintiff Offers Proof of RT Vanderbilt Knowledge of Asbestos in Talc
Posted by Chris in Mesothelioma on January 24th, 2010
In the courts rages a major debate as to whether the talc in varios products actually contains asbestos. RT Vanderbilt says no. Here is the proof submitted by one plaintiff with mesothelioma who alleges that Vanderbilt talc caused mesothelioma.
Cohen Placitella & Roth Force Numerous Asbestos Executives to Admit Knowledge of Asbestos Dangers, No Testing & No Warnings
Posted by Chris in Defective Products, Mesothelioma on January 17th, 2010
Hundreds of thousands of working men and women were unwittingly exposed to asbestos both during the course of their employment and as consumers. The law imposes on the manufacturers the duty to warn and the duty to test. Despite these obligations and extensive knowledge of the dangers posed by asbestos exposure, warnings were not provided and people as a result became sick. Tens of thousands of people have died. Recent statistics demonstrate that the incidence of asbestos related mesothelioma has not even peaked as of 2010.
In representing people who have contracted mesothelioma, we have taken the depositions of numerous asbestos company representatives as well as executives from industrial facilities where asbestos was a known contaminant. You can read these depositions and draw your own conclusions as to whether the companies acted properly under the circumstances. All you need to do is to click on this link http://www.mesotheliomalegalblog.com/mesothelioma-litigation/depositions.html

